News Archive

Rosebud sued Adobe for infringing Rosebud’s ’280 patent.  Adobe moved for summary judgment on the grounds that it ceased making and selling the accused product before ...

This case involved claim construction issues with respect to the grant of summary judgment on non-infringement to Seagate and Compaq on different grounds. 

First, the ...

This case presents three issues: (1) whether there was corroborating evidence of a prior public use by the accused infringer Transweb; (2) whether 3M committed inequitable ...

In this IPR proceeding brought by Synopsys challenging claims of Mentor’s patent, the PTAB held that the IPR itself was not time-barred due to Synopsys acquiring a company ...

Synopsis challenged the PTO’s regulation that allows the PTAB to institute IPRs on all or some of the challenged claims and the PTO’s practice of issuing final decisions ...

In this IPR proceeding brought by Adidas, Nike filed a motion to amend by cancelling claims 1-46 and proposing substitute claims 47-50.  The PTAB granted Nike’s motion to ...

This case involved printer cartridges sold in the U.S. by Lexmark with the explicit restriction that they were for single use only and could only be returned to Lexmark and ...

The court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment that Mr. Lismont’s request to correct the inventorship on Binzel’s patent was precluded under the ...

The Federal Circuit reversed and remanded the decision of the PTAB finding the asserted claims to be obvious due to the PTAB’s erroneous construction for the term ...

The Federal Circuit held that the PTAB had correctly given the claim terms “continuity member” and “shaped to fit” their broadest reasonable interpretation, but ...

Nuance, the patent owner, appeals two issues.  First, Nuance contends that the district court erred in construing the claim term “identifying” to have its plain and ...

In an inter partes reexamination involving a patent on paper shredders, the examiner found the claimed shredder to have been obvious.  The shredder included two sensors, a ...

This appeal involved five patents asserted by Apple and two patents asserted by Samsung.

On Apple’s ’647 patent, which involved a system for recognizing structures in ...

The claims at issue relate to a two-way interactive communication network system for enabling communications between local subscribers and a base station.  The claims ...

The court addressed two issues on Liown’s appeal of the grant of a preliminary injunction to Luminara.  First, Liown contended that Luminara lacked standing to bring the ...

The court addressed two issues on Liown’s appeal of the grant of a preliminary injunction to Luminara.  First, Liown contended that Luminara lacked standing to bring the ...

McKool Smith is pleased to announce that attorneys from the firm's Austin, Dallas, and Houston offices have been selected for inclusion in the Super Lawyers 2016 Texas ...

Managing IP has named McKool Smith the 2016 U.S. “Patent Contentious Firm of the Year (South)” at its eighth annual North America Awards.  The awards ceremony and dinner ...

McKool Smith is one of only 12 law firms in the country to be featured in The National Law Journal’s listing of the top plaintiff practices/firms in the country. In its ...

The court affirmed the PTO’s finding that claims of a pending patent application are unpatentable due to obviousness over the combination of a reference to Gross in view of ...

Covidien petitioned the PTO for an inter partes review of Ethicon’s patent.  The Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) instituted the IPR and then, following the trial ...

The district court did not err in refusing to strike a Section 101 patent eligibility defense or in granting summary judgment under Section 101 holding patent claims on ...

The district court held the patent-in-suit to be patent ineligible under Section 101.  It further found that the case was exceptional under Section 285 because, even under ...

This appeal involves the amount of a patent term adjustment awarded to Pfizer.  Pfizer filed the lawsuit seeking to reverse the PTO’s amount of the adjustment and to add back ...

Akzo appealed the district court’s grant of summary judgment of non-infringement, both literally and under the doctrine of equivalents and Dow cross-appealed the ...

The jury’s verdict of non-infringement in this case turned on the meaning of two claim terms: “independent storage unit” and “in files.”  The Federal Circuit held ...

This case involves an appeal to the Federal Circuit of the PTO’s decision in an inter partes reexamination.  The third party requesting the inter partes reexamination was ...

McKool Smith has been recognized by Law360 as one of five “Go-To” trial firms in the country in a report published on February 26, 2016.  In the report, Law360 notes that ...

A California state judge recently ruled that a jury should hear Quincy Jones' $10 million lawsuit against Sony Music Entertainment and Michael Jackson's production ...

McKool Smith was awarded United States “IP Firm of the Year” at the 2016 Benchmark U.S. awards for the second year in a row. Fellow nominees included Fish & Richardson; ...

McKool Smith principal Sam Baxter has been recognized as an “Icon of IP” by Law360. According to Law360, the publication’s IP Icon series honors “individuals who ...

McKool Smith principal Pierre Hubert discusses the changing climate of the PTAB forum and the recent drop in institutional decisions of inter partes review petitions in a ...

On remand from the Supreme Court to determine the correct construction of the claim term “virtual machine” in light of Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 135 U.S. 831 ...

The patent owner MCM appealed the PTAB’s holding in an inter partes review proceeding that the claims of the patent were invalid as being obvious on three grounds.  First ...

This is an appeal from a bench trial on the sole issue of damages for a patent covering a standard in the wireless communications field that is practiced on chips that are used in ...

The court affirmed the PTAB’s construction of three claim terms in an IPR proceeding under the broadest reasonable interpretation standard, and, under those ...

The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s construction for the claim term “mobile device” to exclude devices that contain “computer modules.”  ...

The court affirmed the PTAB’s finding that SightSound’s patents were invalid as being obvious in connection with Apple’s requested Covered Business Method (CBM ...

The court affirmed the PTAB’s finding that Merck’s claims were obvious over the prior art.  The court, applying the substantial evidence standard of review to the ...

In a companion case to Merck v. Gnosis, decided on the same day, South Alabama makes essentially the same arguments why the PTAB erred by finding that the claims at issue would ...

The court reversed the finding of anticipation, because the patent examiner misapplied the “printed matter doctrine.”  Under the doctrine, if a claim limitation ...

On remand from the Supreme Court (which held that a defendant’s belief that a patent is invalid is not a defense to induced infringement), the court addressed Cisco’s ...

The court affirmed the district court’s denial of Redline’s motion to submit four new exhibits—an expert declaration, CV, and two pieces of prior art—that was ...

In an IPR proceeding brought by Berk-Tek, the PTAB held that asserted claims 1-4 were invalid as being obvious and held that the validity of claims 5-6 would be confirmed.  On ...

This case involved claims against two defendants, Teva and Amphastar.  The patent claims at issue involved a method for “quality control release testing” of an ...

The court affirmed the grant of summary judgment of non-infringement.  On appeal, the patentee, Imaginal, argued that the district court erred in construing the term ...

The patent at issue related to a method for treating certain female patients having a certain type of irritable bowel syndrome.  The court affirmed the district court’s ...

The claim at issue related to a container packing system which required that a certain piston-and-cylinder unit be connected to the “proximate end” of the base and ...

The district court held that the claims of four of Cubist’s patents were invalid as being obvious and held that the claims of the fifth of Cubist’s patents were not invalid ...

In an inter partes reexamination proceeding, the patentee amended its claims to add a negative limitation: “the chip selects . . . are DDR chip selects that are not CAS, RAS ...